Overview:
A WARNING
During the time that
our Commission conducted its investigation a number of other reports
appeared with recommendations for improved safety in nuclear power
plants. While we are generally aware of the nature of these
recommendations, we have not attempted a systematic analysis of them.
Insofar as other agencies may have reached similar conclusions and
proposed similar remedies, several groups arriving at the same conclusion
should reinforce the weight of these conclusions.
But we have an
overwhelming concern about some of the reports we have seen so far. While
many of the proposed "fixes" seem totally appropriate, they do not come
to grips with what we consider to be the ' basic problem. We have stated
that fundamental changes must occur in organizations, procedures, and,
above all, in the attitudes of people No amount of technical "fixes" will
cure this underlying problem. There have been many previous
recommendations for greater safety for nuclear power plants, which have
had limited impact. What we consider crucial is whether the proposed
improvements are carried out by the same organizations (unchanged), with
the same kinds of practices and the same attitudes that were prevalent
prior to the accident. As long as proposed improvements are carried out in
a "business as usual" atmosphere, the fundamental changes necessitated by
the accident at Three Mile Island
cannot be realized.
We believe that we
have conscientiously carried out the mandate of the President of the United States,
within our limits as human beings and within the limitations of the time
allowed us. We have not found a magic formula that would guarantee that
there will be no serious future nuclear accidents. Nor have we come up
with a detailed blueprint for nuclear safety. And our recommendations will
require great efforts by others to translate them into effective plans.
Nevertheless, we feel
that our findings and recommendations are of vital importance for the
future of nuclear power. We are convinced that, unless portions of the
industry and its regulatory agency undergo fundamental changes, they will
over time totally destroy public confidence and, hence, they will be
responsible for the elimination of nuclear power as a viable source of
energy.
|